CWC2023::Netherlands stun South Africa, pull off only their 3rd win in World Cup history.
Delhi: Netherlands looked to be heading for a third successive defeat when they stumbled to 82 for five. However, a brilliant unbeaten 78 off 69 balls from wicketkeeper-captain Scott Edwards saw them post a competitive 245 for eight, and it was a total that proved beyond the hitherto impressive Proteas.
Having been 36 without loss, the former Somerset all-rounder Roelof van der Merwe, who had contributed a handy 29 from 19 balls with the bat, took two quick wickets and South Africa were suddenly reeling on 44 for four.
Despite 43 from David Miller, they lost wickets at regular intervals and were beaten for the first time in the tournament.
“At 112-6 we didn’t want to let them get over 200 and we definitely dropped the ball there,” said Temba Bavuma, the losing captain. “We were still confident that we could chase down the score but we didn’t get partnerships and we didn’t adapt to the double spin in the powerplay.
Earlier, in the rain-affected World Cup match, Scott Edwards led from the front to help the Netherlands register an impressive recovery, ultimately reaching a total of 245 for eight. The intermittent rain not only added a chilly atmosphere to the mountain venue but also shortened the match to a 43-over-a-side contest
Player of the match:: Scott Edward.
Pingback: SKY WIND
Pingback: Weber Summit Kamado
Pingback: SkyWind ค่ายเกมสล็อตมาแรง
Pingback: ไทรเกาหลี
Pingback: lost vape e plus pod
Pingback: more information
Pingback: คาสิโน playtech รองรับทุกอุปกรณ์
Pingback: live cams
Pingback: จดแจ้งเครื่องสำอาง
Pingback: highbay
Pingback: ดูบอลสด66
Pingback: โกดังเช่า ราคาถูก
Pingback: supplements
Pingback: click here
Pingback: check here
Pingback: Hotpot
Pingback: มีบุตรยาก
Pingback: Japan Auction Sheet Verification
Pingback: สั่งของจากจีน
Pingback: ศัลยกรรมตาสองชั้น
Pingback: read
Pingback: ลดผมร่วง
Pingback: ยิง sms
72446 966983Wohh just what I was searching for, thanks for putting up. 602924
I think this is among the most important info for me.
And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles
is really nice : D. Good job, cheers
I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you make this website yourself or did you hire someone to do
it for you? Plz reply as I’m looking to construct my
own blog and would like to find out where u got this from.
thanks a lot
67899 930732hi!,I love your writing so much! 747948
583652 417914Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I believe I learned much more from this post. Im extremely glad to see such great information being shared freely out there. 440579
337924 626412Hello, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Ie, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, amazing blog! 951608
987630 655102We can have a link alternate arrangement between us! 17747
297511 478464Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your internet site? My blog is inside the exact exact same area of interest as yours and my visitors would truly benefit from some of the information you supply here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Thanks! 792035
Well I sincerely liked reading it. This information provided by you is very helpful for good planning.
In this grand design of things you’ll get an A+ just for hard work. Exactly where you lost us ended up being on the details. You know, people say, the devil is in the details… And that couldn’t be much more correct in this article. Having said that, let me reveal to you exactly what did do the job. The article (parts of it) is certainly incredibly convincing and this is probably the reason why I am making the effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, although I can easily notice the jumps in reasoning you come up with, I am definitely not confident of how you seem to connect the points which inturn make the final result. For the moment I will, no doubt yield to your issue however hope in the future you actually connect the dots much better.